Solution Intelligence

Layer: Solution | Phase: Pilot Design (Weeks 2-4) | Status: Pending — populates after gate-1 passes

This layer answers: what's the pilot, how complex is integration, what does it cost, what's the value hypothesis, how do we know it worked?

---

Pilot Scope & Design

To be populated post-discovery.

• Pilot project: TBD (recommendation: P2 customer, e.g., Heliene or Midwest)
• Anchor gate: TBD
• Achievements in pilot: Achievement 1 (Engineer's Lens) + Achievement 2 (Team Lead's Cockpit)
• Workflows in scope: TBD — typically capture, decision-ledger, timesheet auto-draft, status cockpit
• Workflows out of scope (off-ramp): TBD

Integration Complexity

Complexity drivers per system:

System	API	Complexity
Jira	Standard REST	Low/medium (depends on custom fields)
Smartsheet	Standard API	Low
Timesheet workbook	File-based	Low/medium
CAD/EDA	TBD	Unknown until tools confirmed
Identity / SSO	TBD	Unknown

Effort & Cost Estimate

Filled at gate-2.

• Atomic47: [N] engineer-weeks
• Daanaa: [N] engineer-weeks pairing + review
• Cost range: [$X-$Y]

Value Hypothesis

Primary: Capturing engineering reasoning and decisions passively — projecting them into existing artifacts — reclaims minutes per engineer per day, makes timesheet entries auto-generated and accepted, and gives team leads a live cockpit they don't have to assemble.

Secondary: ISO audit surface reduces because traceability becomes automatic; IP class metadata travels on every record.

Success Metrics

Concrete and falsifiable:

• 20-30% reduction in documentation creation time
• 15-25% cycle-time improvement (design to review to gate)

• =90% on-time gate readiness

• Defect / rework reduction vs baseline
• User satisfaction >= 4/5